Upgrade scripts?

[stéphane ducasse]

Ok I got confused.
With Cees 276 sorry not to read well.
Stef

On 26 oct. 05, at 15:24, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> Hmm? Monticello-bf.277 is a direct child of your Monticello- 
> stephaneducasse.276 version which *is* in 3.9a, only two methods  
> related to scripts changed.
>
> - Bert -
>
> Am 26.10.2005 um 15:12 schrieb stéphane ducasse:
>
>
>> I wanted to push MC277 into the squeakfoundation 3.9a repository  
>> but I saw that it was based on Integrated PlusTools.zip (Mantis  
>> #1915).
>> So is it safe for me to conclude that I should integrate all the  
>> PlusTools changes before the fix of bert in MC?
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>     http://source.impara.de/Stuff/Graphics-bf.24.mcz
>>>>> you'll get an Abort notice when loading Graphics-bf.24 in an  
>>>>> unsafe  image:
>>>>>     (BitBlt canUnderstand: #displayString:from:to:at:kern:font:)
>>>>>         ifFalse: [Abort new signal: 'need to load Graphics-ar. 
>>>>> 21  first!']
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This looks good. Can I rely on this behavior in the future? I  
>>>> don't know if what you say about packageinfo having scripts  
>>>> relates to or invalidates the above. I'd be perfectly happy with  
>>>> the above solution.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, the script is executed if you have that fixed Monticello  
>>> version, or PackageInfo with script support. Republishing the  
>>> package will retain the script only if you have the right  
>>> PackageInfo.
>>>
>>> Unless we decide to remove script support from MC this should  
>>> continue to work.
>>>
>>> - Bert -
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>