[Seaside-dev] Seaside 2.8 release planning

[Dale Henrichs]

I can do the merge within a day or so of the announcement of the final 
package.

Dale

Philippe Marschall wrote:

>Hi
>
>With http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6497 fixed the last blocker of
>Seaside 2.8 is gone as far as I'm concered. Personally I'm very happy
>how the beta phase went. Most of the bugs where either long standing
>(2.7 or even earlier) or only minor. This and the amount for
>production action Seaside 2.8 has already seen makes me quite
>confident. All the comments of Roger Whitney are more than a bonus.
>There are now two left which would be nice if we have them fixed but
>are not critical as far as I'm concerned:
>
>http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6490
>Someone should confirm this is fixed.
>
>http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6527
>I don't consider this critical. It affects only the url which is first
>displayed when a new session is created. #initialRequest and
>#updateUrl: still work and any following "page" will have the
>paramters.
>
>On Squeak we also plan to releas compatible versions of:
>- Scriptaculous
>- Comet
>- RSRSS2
>
>On Squeak the release will probably work as follows:
> * prepare the announcement mail with exact Monticello version numbers
> * contact Damien for upgrade on Universes. This probably will be
>bigger because it means that Seaside 2.8 moves from web development
>beta and the other packages will have to be updated as well
> * update Seaside Installer on SqueakMap
> * send the mail
>
>So it comes down to how the porters see this. How confident are you
>about the stability of your ports? How much time do you need once we
>say which Monticello version it will be until you have your ports
>updated?
>
>Cheers
>Philippe
>_______________________________________________
>seaside-dev mailing list
>seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>  
>