[Seaside-dev] Seaside2.8a1-mb.505

[Philippe Marschall]

2007/10/18, Michel Bany <michel.bany at gmail.com>:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> This is confusing. Are you talking about mb.505 or pmm.504?

505. I don't think we should keep 504 in and therefore 505 has the
"wrong" ancestor.

> If you were talking about mb.505, I think it is cool.
> Why would it break Gemstone? Do they use /seaside/go for their urls?

AFAIK and that's exactly why I think it will break

baseName := SeasidePlatformSupport isSqueak
				ifTrue: ['seaside']
				ifFalse: ['seaside/go'].

will return 'seaside/go' on Gemstone since it is not Squeak and
therefore break if it has worked up to now.

Could you explain why VW needs this compilcated setup of dispatcher hierarchies?

Cheers
Philippe

> Don't they have #defaultDispatcherName?
>
> If you were talking about pmm.504, we can back it off.
> Is this what you want?
>
> BTW, are the Gemstone guys on this list? If yes, hello to them :)
>
> Cheers,
> Michel.
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 17, 2007, at 9:14 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>
> > I don't think this is cool. I have no image at hand but I'd guess it
> > will break on Gemstone.
> >
> > Do we really want to keep Seaside2.8a1-pmm.504? It's more of hack and
> > doesn't really solve the deeper problem. I'd rather reject it.
> >
> > Philippe
> > _______________________________________________
> > seaside-dev mailing list
> > seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>