[Seaside-dev] ConfigurationOfSeaside30 3.0.0-alpha5.15 ready for a bit of review

[Julian Fitzell]

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich at vmware.com> wrote:
> Philippe Marschall wrote:
>>
>> 2010/6/24 Julian Fitzell <jfitzell at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich at vmware.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Julian Fitzell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It appears that Tests-Functional, Tools-Web, and Welcome depend on
>>>>> Widgets. This means it will get loaded in Base anyway, so it's not the
>>>>> end of the world, though I wonder if we should change those
>>>>> dependencies to make them more explicit. I'm inclined to say yes...
>>>>> others?
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich at vmware.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julian,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Widgets is included because it is listed as an Environment dependency
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the GRPackage definition, so I don't know whether there is an actual
>>>>>> dependency or an artificial one...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dale
>>>>
>>>> Julian,
>>>>
>>>> Are you saying that you want Welcome to be made part of the Base? I
>>>> thought
>>>> the point of the Base group was to provide a minimal set of packages
>>>> that
>>>> would be the starting point for anyone that was building a Seaside app.
>>>> That
>>>> meant to me that extra things not really needed (like Welcome and
>>>> Tools-Web
>>>> and Widgets) would be excluded ... If someone is loading Pier, I
>>>> wouldn't
>>>> think that the SeasideWelcome would show up as the default application,
>>>> or
>>>> even be loaded unless explicitly asked for ...
>>>>
>>>> That's why I'm using Magritte-Seaside as my use case right now and
>>>> trying to
>>>> think of the folks building applications no top of Seaside ...
>>>>
>>>> I think the explicit dependencies are already in place, but I can take a
>>>> look...
>>>
>>> No, I thought Tools-Web was included in Base and thus that Widgets
>>> would be loaded. Welcome doesn't want to be in Base, I agree.
>>
>> I'd like Welcome to be in something like "One-Click" that would also
>> include Development, Kom and OB. Basically the stuff we want first
>> time users and people coming form 2.8 to have. That should feel more
>> or less like 2.8 used to feel.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Philippe
>> _______________________________________________
>> seaside-dev mailing list
>> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>
> Philippe/Julian,
>
> Are there any tests that you'd like included in the One-Click (or were
> planned to be in the One-Click) ... I could wait for Julian to ship the
> One-Click image itself and then model the One-Click group, but I would
> imagine that it wouldn't be too hard to specify the sets of tests to be
> included (if at all)...

The one-click has traditionally included more or less everything. :)
You can look at the image at
http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Seaside%203.0/219/ . The one-click
I'm building is more or less the same, just without Lukas' preference
modifications (we felt it was confusing to new users if our pharo
behaves differently than standard pharo).

Or take a look at the build scripts here:
http://github.com/renggli/builder/tree/master/scripts

Julian