[Seaside-dev] 3.0.3.2 or 3.0.4

[Avi Shefi]

Hi,
Issue 640 is a programmer's mistake, and doesn't have anything to do with
Seaside.
To my understanding the issue can be closed, and therefore shouldn't be a an
obstacle for 3.0.4.
Cheers,
Avi.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich at vmware.com> wrote:

> On 02/08/2011 11:11 AM, Julian Fitzell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Philippe Marschall
>> <philippe.marschall at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> 2011/2/8 Dale Henrichs<dhenrich at vmware.com>:
>>>
>>>> So what do you guys think? Is 3.0.4 ready to rumba?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about the fix for Issue 640 (Seaside-Core-as.694,
>>> Seaside-Core-as.695). I'd like to discuss that first with Lukas.
>>>
>>
>> Agreed. I don't think we can release with that issue in the state it's
>> in. We can easily revert it and release though, if anyone's keen.
>>
>> Julian
>> _______________________________________________
>> seaside-dev mailing list
>> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>>
>
> Personally, I'd rather focus on getting the symbolic version ecosystem
> cleaned up which can be done in 3.0.3.2, but if it's time to push 3.0.4,
> I'll roll the two tasks into one.
>
> Dale
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside-dev/attachments/20110208/102e2757/attachment.htm