[Seaside-dev] Grease on Pharo 2.0

[Dale Henrichs]

>From a configuration perspective it will be simpler if I don't have to specify the package for 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 ... just specifying for 1.x is much simpler and BlockContext _exists_ in the 1.x line of Pharo images, whether or not they are loaded ... so sticking with Grease-Pharo1x-Core would still make sense ...

And then there is tomorrow or the day after tomorrow when the Pharo2.x line radically departs from Pharo1.x ... the Grease-Pharo1x-Core will give us a ready made package for pushing those changes into and at that point we'll create GreasePharo2x-Core ...

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Philippe Marschall" <philippe.marschall at gmail.com>
| To: "Seaside - developer list" <seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
| Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:41:08 AM
| Subject: Re: [Seaside-dev] Grease on Pharo 2.0
| 
| On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich at vmware.com>
| wrote:
| > This morning we got a request to get Grease ported to Pharo2.0 ...
| >
| > The issue is that the class BlockContext is not present in
| > Pharo2.0.
| >
| > So we have a packaging decision to make and we have several
| > options:
| >
| >  1. rename Grease-Pharo-Core to Grease-Pharo20-Core for Pharo2.0
| >  2. fork Grease-Pharo-Core for Pharo2.0 creating
| >  Grease-Pharo-Core.pharo20
| >  3. move the BlockContext methods from Grease-Pharo_Core to
| >     Grease-Pharo1x-Core ... no need for a GreasePharo2x-Core
| >     package yet.
| >  4. other alternatives?
| 
| BlockContext is only really needed in 1.2 and older, right? 1.3+ with
| Cog don't need it, right? If so I would create a Grease-Pharo12-Core
| (like we have Grease-Pharo11-Core and Grease-Pharo10-Core).
| 
| Cheers
| Philippe
| _______________________________________________
| seaside-dev mailing list
| seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
| http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
|