[Seaside-dev] Re: point development and bleedingEdge for Pharo1 &
2 to release 3.1
Tobias Pape
Das.Linux at gmx.de
Sun Jan 31 16:14:56 UTC 2016
On 31.01.2016, at 17:10, Johan Brichau <johan at inceptive.be> wrote:
>
>> On 31 Jan 2016, at 16:56, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl> wrote:
>>
>> On 31-01-16 11:23, Johan Brichau wrote:
>>> Hi Stephan,
>>>
>>> Is it a good idea to tag bleedingEdge and development on Pharo 1 and 2 such that it’s a fixed release 3.1 ?
>>>
>>> Sounds confusing to me for people, no?
>>
>> Yes, and I presume it is better than non-running code?
>> Should I add a "no development and bleedingEdge anymore on Pharo 1 and 2"?
>
> Can we make Metacello say there is no development nor bleedingEdge versions on those platforms ?
> I seem to remember there was a way to do that but my mind might play tricks on me…
you can use the symbolic name #broken , IIRC:
bleedingEdge
<symbolicVersion: #'bleedingEdge'>
spec for: #'pharo1.x' version: #broken.
Best
-tobias
>
> Johan
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
More information about the seaside-dev
mailing list