<div dir="ltr"><div>Thanks for the explanation (and for gently explaining to this rookie that he missed a step).</div>
<div> </div>
<div>John O'Keefe [|], Principal Smalltalk Architect, Instantiations Inc.<br><br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Philippe Marschall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:philippe.marschall@gmail.com">philippe.marschall@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hi list<br><br>There seems to be some confusion about what the protocol for working<br>on Seaside issues is.<br>
<br>Here's what happened<br>- John created an issue <a href="http://code.google.com/p/seaside/issues/detail?id=133" target="_blank">http://code.google.com/p/seaside/issues/detail?id=133</a><br>- He assigned it to himself and though that would tell everybody that<br>
he works on it.<br>- I saw the issue and fixed it while John was working on it at the same time.<br><br>My excuses to John for stealing the issue. I think he followed the<br>correct protocol and I didn't. To explain myself a bit more:<br>
I the past I acted the same way on several assigned bugs and that<br>never caused a conflict. At not time to my knowldge was somebody else<br>working on one. I think mainly because if you create an issue, you'll<br>automatically be owner.<br>
<br>To avoid such conflicts in future I propose that we set the issue to<br>started if we started to work on it or we plan to fix it shortly.<br><br>Cheers<br>Philippe<br>_______________________________________________<br>
seaside-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:seaside-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org">seaside-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>