Hi!<br><br>Because I am using this method in my GemStone Scaffolding Project.<br>And in my case I have to check for nil.<br>I know the other solution would be an extra exception handler.<br>But I don't see any big disadvantages for returning nil if the application is not found!<br>
In normal case this should never happen anyway!<br><br>Cheers<br>Gerhard<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Philippe Marschall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:philippe.marschall@gmail.com">philippe.marschall@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">What is the motivation behind this change? Returning nil hardly<br>
prevents any exceptions, instead it just triggers a<br>
MessageNotUnderstood because nobody checks for return values. Also the<br>
only senders of this method are tests.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
Philippe<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
seaside-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:seaside-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org">seaside-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>