On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Philippe Marschall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:philippe.marschall@gmail.com">philippe.marschall@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
2010/5/21 Julian Fitzell <<a href="mailto:jfitzell@gmail.com">jfitzell@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div class="im">> So when you say hacked in, you mean I should try not to include these<br>
> versions this weekend? :)<br>
<br>
</div>No, by all means include it so that it gets tested. What I mean is the<br>
code is probably not going to stay in the state it is currently in.<br>
Which doesn't matter so much for Pharo but matters for everybody else<br>
who wants to build an optimized implementation for his platform.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> I'm afraid your question doesn't leave me with enough information to provide<br>
> an opinion. Obviously faster == better, but what's the downside? I don't<br>
> quite understand what the end result is.<br>
<br>
</div>The end result is methods on platform for escaping xml and urls with<br>
the current code the default implementation on GRPlatform.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br></div></div></blockquote><div>Isn't that a bit funny given the infrastructure of platform-specific codecs we have already? (sorry, haven't looked at the code yet... will do on the weekend)<br>
</div></div><br>Julian<br>