[Seaside] Google placement examples?

[Nevin Pratt]

What do you all think of the idea of mirroring the dynamic pages of 
Seaside with google-friendly static pages, and then if Comanche sees a 
googlebot coming, it sends it down the static pages?

Yes, this would result in static URL's that are being indexed.  But it's 
not difficult to have those static URL's in turn go back into Seaside. 
 The only issue with doing this is that you end up with a new 
WASession-- which isn't an issue at all when the user is coming in from 
a search engine result.

So, in other words, a given static URL would either go into Seaside, or 
down a static page tree, depending on whether client is a googlebot or not.

Bad idea?

What in the world can we do to make Seaside more Google friendly?

Nevin


Nevin Pratt wrote:

> Upon examination of my web logs, it appears that the googlebot hits 
> the home page, and then goes no further.
>
> It does indeed index the home page, but nothing else.
>
> Nevin
>
>
> Nevin Pratt wrote:
>
>> Does anybody have a single example of a Seaside web page that has 
>> *any* placement at all with Google?
>>
>> Our site, http://www.bountifulbaby.com, used to enjoy the #1 position 
>> with Google when you searched on the two words 'reborn berenguer' 
>> (either with or without the quotes-- it didn't matter).
>>
>> But now, we seem to have zero placement (other than residual 
>> references to old pages that no longer exist since I converted to 
>> Seaside).
>>
>> Nevin
>>
>>