[Seaside] Gardner, SmallWiki, Swiki, or?
stephen at pairhome.net
Tue Nov 18 14:13:27 CET 2003
I would definitely choose something based on the SmallWiki parser (which
means SmallWiki or Gardner). SmallWiki is fully functional now but
doesn't use Seaside. Gardner is a little more basic (in terms of
functionality and the UI) but uses Seaside. With the SmallWiki parser,
you'll have a much easier time when and if you need to customize it. I
would also upgrade to Squeak 3.6 and Comanche 6.2 as soon as possible.
I think running in a separate image is the safe way to go here.
Nevin Pratt wrote:
> Well, I want to plug a wiki into my site:
> Click the "Forum" button on my site-- that's where the wiki will go.
> Or maybe I should say, when the "Forum" button is clicked, you are to
> be taken to my Wiki. The Wiki probably doesn't particularly need to
> be integrated with the rest of the site. Or should it? Hmm...
> I'm currently running Squeak 3.5, Comanche 5.x, Seaside 2.3b
> Which wiki should I try?
> Gardner seems cool, but as I mentioned, I don't particular see the
> need to have my Wiki be part of Seaside. Or just maybe I'm missing
> the big picture here, and not seeing some advantage that exists by
> integrating it with Seaside.
> Plus Gardner requires SmallWiki? And SmallWiki requires Comanche 6.x?
> And I'm running Comanche 5.x.
> Hmm, maybe I should just run another image for the wiki? How about I
> just download an existing Com/Wiki combo and run it as a separate image?
> Decisions, decisions... anybody got any advice?
More information about the Seaside