[Seaside] Gardner, SmallWiki, Swiki, or?
stephen at pairhome.net
Tue Nov 18 20:12:34 CET 2003
The version of SmallWiki that Chris ported and that I worked on looks
like it's newer than the one Gardner was using. It seems to handle
nested lists just fine. So, I think it's probably the newer parser. My
monticello based version and the SmallWiki package on SqueakMap both
have this newer looking parser.
Lukas Renggli wrote:
>> I would definitely choose something based on the SmallWiki parser
>> (which means SmallWiki or Gardner). SmallWiki is fully functional
>> now but doesn't use Seaside. Gardner is a little more basic (in
>> terms of functionality and the UI) but uses Seaside. With the
>> SmallWiki parser, you'll have a much easier time when and if you need
>> to customize it.
> This September the SmallWiki parser has been been partially rewritten
> by John Brant. I assume that you are using still the old one?
> The new parser supports escaping of special characters, nested lists
> and has got a much better handling of embedded Smalltalk blocks.
> Furthermore it is much faster, uses less memory and isn't complaining
> anymore about a slightly invalid syntax.
More information about the Seaside