[Seaside] Re: hosting Seaside apps

[Yanni Chiu]

Cees de Groot wrote:
> 
> Make that minimal CPU usage :-). Squeak server images and the virtual
> machine have a tendency to eat cycles...

Would the hosting company providing a virtual dedicated server
have a big issue (i.e. don't it here) with a Squeak image that
consumes about 3% of cpu when "idle"? I recall the issue being
mentioned once before, but don't know how it was resolved (or
maybe it was an isolated instance with a provider who was over-
booking a machine).

The other issue I recall was that Squeak's socket usage had
some issues - something to do with which network interface
to use (e.g. on machines with more than one). Sorry, I didn't
understand the issue then, and still don't. Perhaps there's
no such problem on a virtual server with only one virtual
network interface.

--yanni