On Mar 29, 2004, at 2:43 AM, danil osipchuk wrote: > Heh, why "where 1=1" and not "where true" ? :) For some reason that's what I've always used for an always-true clause in SQL - I think I must have been using some SQL implementation at some point that didn't allow "where true" and it stuck. But yes, that should probably be changed :). Avi