[Seaside] Re: Seaside Apps Web Hosting

[John Pfersich]

Have you run a tinyBechmarks on it?

At 01:57 PM 6/27/2005 +0200, Bert wrote:

>Am 27.06.2005 um 12:20 schrieb Avi Bryant:
>
>>On 6/27/05, goran at krampe.se <goran at krampe.se> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Anyway, the specific numbers for unixshell-96 ($20/month) are:
>>>         96Mb RAM (192Mb swap), 9 Gb disk, 96 Gb traffic, 1 IP and
>>>1 snapshot
>>>
>>>10 Euro is about $12 I think, so the 64-offering from unixshell seems
>>>like a closer match.
>>>
>>>For the other plans (there are even cheaper ones) see:
>>>         http://www.unixshell.com/index.php?page=services
>>>
>>>I am very satisfied so far anyway. :)
>>
>>My main concern with unixshell has been CPU.  From what I can tell,
>>1MB of RAM in their packages maps to about 1 bogomips of CPU, which in
>>turn maps (very roughly, of course) to about 1Mhz of x86 CPU - so a
>>unixshell-96 isn't guaranteeing any better performance than you would
>>get from a Pentium 100.  The small amount of benchmarking I've done on
>>a unixshell-192 seems to bear this out.  So while I'd use those boxes
>>for mail or mainly static sites (I use one for a wordpress blog and
>>it's been fine), I wouldn't expect to run many Squeak/Seaside apps on
>>them.
>
>I could run benchmarks at server4you if anyone could recommend any.
>
>"top" reports 6 G total + 8 G swap, but I have no idea how much of
>that my vserver can actually use?
>
>
>- Bert -
>
>_______________________________________________
>Seaside mailing list
>Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/seaside