AW: [Seaside] WML (was Re: Seaside Installer)
jbjohns at libsource.com
Thu Aug 10 17:47:42 UTC 2006
Well, that is certainly a good point and you have more experience doing
web sites then I do I'm sure. But if you are 100% right and all mobiles
will use straight HTML, we still have the situation that those devices
have to get a different view of the same page. In other words, the
final HTML, etc. a client gets depends on what type of client they are.
Von: seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] Im Auftrag von Avi
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. August 2006 19:42
An: The Squeak Enterprise Aubergines Server - general discussion.
Betreff: [Seaside] WML (was Re: Seaside Installer)
On Aug 10, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Jason Johnson wrote:
> But I really believe that at some point WML devices are going to start
> gaining ground. They wont eliminate the browser or anything, but
> get to
> the point that saying your websites support phones on delivery will
> decide if you get the contract or not.
How many WML-only phones are out there anymore? Most of the devices
that I see people use support HTML (and in fact my phone, the
Sidekick II, doesn't even bother with WML support). I think the idea
of a parallel web just for mobile devices was always a non-starter.
The best way to support mobile devices, IMO, is to provide a no-
frills, no-ajax version of your site with very simple markup, few
images, etc. WML is a waste of time.
It's possible I'm coming from a biased perspective, though - this is
the kind of thing that can be very regional. Anyone out there seeing
heavy WML use?
Seaside mailing list
Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the Seaside