[Seaside] temp var puzzle

Adrian Lienhard adi at netstyle.ch
Mon Feb 6 15:14:26 CET 2006

On Feb 6, 2006, at 15:01 , Bany, Michel wrote:

>> Using a state holder stored in the temp should work too. Like
>> that you would not need an i-var.
>> Adrian
> Hi Adrian,
> Actually any object will do, like a ValueHolder, a collection,

yes sure, I meant value holder.

> even a Customer or whatever, but with this hack the code may
> get somewhat bizarre.

indeed - but maybe still better than using an instance variable...

> Still, the real issue is portability from VW to Squeak :-(

yes, it would be nice to get these kind of things fixed in Squeak.


> Michel.
> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

More information about the Seaside mailing list