[Seaside] temp var puzzle
Adrian Lienhard
adi at netstyle.ch
Mon Feb 6 15:14:26 CET 2006
On Feb 6, 2006, at 15:01 , Bany, Michel wrote:
>> Using a state holder stored in the temp should work too. Like
>> that you would not need an i-var.
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>
> Hi Adrian,
> Actually any object will do, like a ValueHolder, a collection,
yes sure, I meant value holder.
> even a Customer or whatever, but with this hack the code may
> get somewhat bizarre.
indeed - but maybe still better than using an instance variable...
> Still, the real issue is portability from VW to Squeak :-(
yes, it would be nice to get these kind of things fixed in Squeak.
Adrian
>
> Michel.
> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
More information about the Seaside
mailing list