[Seaside] Rails and Seaside
Avi Bryant
avi.bryant at gmail.com
Fri Jan 6 20:58:27 CET 2006
On Jan 6, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Jeremy Shute wrote:
> Yeah, this is a drawback for me, not an advantage.
>
> I have come to admit that I build great code and ugly sites. With
> Seaside, I'm 99.9% sure my sites will remain ugly. There is a HUGE
> advantage in being able to hand a designer an HTML file that their
> copy of
> Dreamweaver understands.
I'm attaching two screenshots hastily grabbed from my current Dabble
development image. The HTML is identical for both; the first is how
it looks coming straight out of Seaside, the second is with some
external CSS applied. Notice much difference?
This is one of the areas where I allow myself to be opinionated.
Developers *should* be producing ugly (and therefore simple and
semantic) HTML. A modern web designer's job isn't to modify that,
but to provide a stylesheet that makes that identical ugly HTML look
beautiful in the browser. If your designer doesn't know how to work
that way, I strongly suggest that you find one who can (or I can put
you in touch with some).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 8.png
Type: image/png
Size: 34723 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://liststest.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20060106/daf822eb/Picture8-0001.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 7.png
Type: image/png
Size: 57075 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://liststest.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20060106/daf822eb/Picture7-0001.png
More information about the Seaside
mailing list