[Seaside] Re: Database Integration
petr at madnetwork.org
Thu Jun 1 20:02:00 UTC 2006
go for Magma, you will have your life a lot easier than with OmniBase.
Brad Fuller wrote:
> Ramon Leon wrote:
>>> Still, it seems that a separate dB would provide a nice way
>>> of accessing different types of data, large quantity of data,
>>> and a good backup system.
>>> Am I wrong in thinking this? Let's say you need to store
>>> audio data and/or video data. This can become quite large.
>>> What architecture are you suggesting when you recommend object dBs?
>> Personally, I use Goods, check out the following tutorials on the
>> There is also, OmniBase, and Magma. Goods and Magma are server based,
>> OmniBase is file based. I never quite got OmniBases tamed for Seaside
>> due to it's multiversion concurrency control and sharing objects between
>> transactions, but I know others have. Magma worked great, as simple as
>> Goods, but was too new at the time; I chose Goods instead. Things may
>> have changed since then.
> Thanks for the pointers. I'll check them out.
More information about the Seaside