[Seaside] Re: [ANN] Seaside Tutorial

[stephane ducasse]

Thanks lukas this is great and I like the idea that people could do  
tutorials.
ESUG or SqF could also help promoting that.

Stef

On 3 mars 06, at 21:55, Lukas Renggli wrote:

> Hi,
>
>> I will be giving a two days "Seaside Tutorial" the 24th and 25th
>> February 2006 at the Nordakademie in Hamburg, Germany. It will be
>> given in german, but the slides, examples and exercises are all in
>> english. If somebody is interested to attend you should contact the
>> Nordakademie.
>
> I just came home from the Seaside Tutorial in Germany, everything went
> well during those two days and I am quite happy with the results.
> Again the students had to fill a feedback form at the end of the
> course that I would like to share the results with you. To give a
> comparison I provide the results of the last years course (2005, first
> value) and this years course (2006, second value). 18 / 17 students
> filled the feedback form, there were 20 / 21 registered attendees.
>
> Note that my intention is not to advertise the tutorial, what I want
> to do is to show that anybody knowledgeable in Seaside is able to
> successfully spread our technology to beginners. Anybody that wants to
> give a Seaside course anywhere in the world can take my slides,
> exercises, and solutions and do something that helps to get people
> aware of Seaside. This is the goal. The next thing to do, is to find a
> way to improve the values in Question 2b. Any ideas?
>
> 1. selection of topics:
> - too simple, nothing new: 0% / 0%
> - right, well understandable: 100% / 100%
> - too difficult, too many prerequisites: 0% / 0%
>
> 2a. personal profit:
> - very high: 47% / 39%
> - high: 47% / 50%
> - low: 6% / 11%
> - very low: 0%
>
> 2b. profit for work:
> - very high: 0% / 0%
> - high: 29% / 28%
> - low: 59% / 61%
> - very low: 12% / 17%
> (comments: smalltalk is dead, seaside is not used in our company, we
> only use SAP, dead technology)
>
> 3. possibility of interaction:
> - yes, question were answered: 100% / 94%
> - adequate, some questions were answered: 0% / 6%
> - no, questions were not answered: 0% / 0%
>
> 4. instructor:
> - convincing in matter and person: 100% / 94%
> - not completely convincing: 0% / 6%
> - not convincing: 0% / 0%
>
> 5. length of the tutorial:
> - should be shorter: 0% / 0%
> - exactly right size: 67% / 59%
> - should be longer: 33% / 41%
>
> 6. satisfaction:
> - very satisfied: 67% / 76%
> - satisfied: 33% / 24%
> - not really satisfied: 0% / 0%
> - not satisfied at all: 0% / 0%
>
> 7. accolade, criticism
> - cool
> - great, want to learn more
> - I would like to attend another tutorial with advanced topics
> - Seaside is very powerful, introduction well structured
> - excellent exercises, good support
> - I am impressed by the technology
> - nice instructor (was this written by a girl?) ;-)
> - ...
>
> 8. overal grade (1 very good - 6 very bad)
> 1.39 / 1.29
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>