norbert at hartl.name
Tue Feb 13 15:15:11 UTC 2007
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:13 -0800, Giles Bowkett wrote:
> Are people using Magma a lot? Should I consider it "ready for prime
> time"? I have an app where an OODBMS might be a lot more useful than
> an RDBMS, but it's hard to really tell how feasible Magma is (Gemstone
> doesn't appear to be feasible because it isn't open source).
I used magma for two month now and it appears to be pretty much
stable. I didn't come to any data corruption or misbehaviour.
And I killed the image very often! Using Magmacollections and
ReadStrategies you can get a decent speed in accessing things.
I switched to Glorp two days ago. This has nothing to do with
Magma. It's just a new insight that on my project the benefits
of an RDBMS are greater than a OODBMS. I personally am looking
forward to do an project using Magma.
Hope it helps,
P.S.: I enjoyed your screencast very much!
More information about the Seaside