[Seaside] Squeak 3.9?
adi at netstyle.ch
Wed Feb 14 23:42:32 UTC 2007
sounds familiar... For us using the screenshot application also
helped to revive the image. If you happen to get more data points it
would be worth opening a Mantis report for that issue.
As Lukas and Philippe reported, apart from that issue, 3.9 is working
fine for us.
Btw, I wouldn't leave a transcript open, apparently its not thread safe.
On Feb 14, 2007, at 23:58 , Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
> I was considering back porting, so I'm glad to hear it. I really
> like 3.9.
> I'm sure as was suggested that I am causing my own problems. I'm
> doing a
> lot of comm and threading, but it seems that I loose gui control
> often and
> even though seaside is still responding and I see transcript
> messages I can
> not get control back! I still haven't tried the VNC trick so maybe
> I'll try
> Thanks everyone. I guess if all else fails I'll port to Pavel's 3.7!
>> From: Lukas Renggli
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 5:36 PM
>> To: Ron at usmedrec.com; The Squeak Enterprise Aubergines Server -
>>> As long as we are on the subject about what people are doing I was
>>> wondering, for the people using squeak, is anyone using Squeak
>>> 3.9 for
>>> production or development and how is the stability of 3.9 vs. 3.8?
>> I use 3.9 for development and deployment of industrial application.
>> Furthermore, all my Seaside, Scriptaculous, Pier and Magritte
>> development is going on in 3.9.
>> Squeak 3.9 is noticeably faster than 3.8 and fixes most annoying bugs
>> related to internalization and wide strings. Moreover it provides a
>> lot of valuable enhancements (e.g. the pragmas) that I wouldn't want
>> to miss ...
>> Lukas Renggli
>> Seaside mailing list
>> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the Seaside