[Seaside] updateRoot: Weirdness

sig siguctua at gmail.com
Thu Jul 19 08:02:38 UTC 2007

On 19/07/07, Philippe Marschall <philippe.marschall at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/7/19, sig <siguctua at gmail.com>:
> > As people says: don't put all of eggs in one basket.
> >
> > Serving all content from single image is nice, but its not always achievable.
> >
> > As web server, Seaside must serve as front-end for delivering content
> > on the web, but not dictate, the original source of content.
> Seaside is not a webserver and not a database layer. It is a web
> application development framework. Webservers live Apache for lighttpd
> are preferable for serving static files because this is the job they
> are really good at and optimized for. They are written in C they use
> epoll/sendfile and multiple processors and caching and what not. It is
> a simple one time investment that takes off load of your
> Squeak/Seaside image and gives it more time and resources to do what
> it is good and optimized for: dynamic content. That doesn't mean there
> is no place for a simple solution for simple problems. But at the end
> of the day for any serious application you will need a standalone
> webserver.

Hey, lets look to the roots: Seaside serving http requests. And i can
assure you, that for 99% of the users in the world, thing which
serving http requests called web-server.
You may call it web application development framework or anything you
want, but this will not makes any difference unless you stop handling
http requests.
Its a layer, which delivers content to browsers using standard
protocol and from this point of view, it must be flexible enough to be
able to deliver any content which developer wants to.

And you saying 'standalone web server'.. It looks like you insist that
seaside in 90% cases in not complete solution for _BASIC_ web
Why it must force developer to use third party tools to be complete?
Its better to be slow, as hog but be COMPLETE rather than flexible,
complex, but incomplete...

> Philippe
> > Is there something wrong with this concept?
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seaside mailing list
> > Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

More information about the Seaside mailing list