[Seaside] character encoding again
philippe.marschall at gmail.com
Mon Mar 5 12:14:34 UTC 2007
2007/3/5, Cédrick Béler <cbeler at enit.fr>:
> I think I need some precisions...
> > I wouldn't do that and I am sure you will sooner or later run into
> > troubles.
> > In my experience the easiest (but certainly not the only) way to make
> > things work is the following:
> > - leave WAHtmlBuilder class>>#initialize as it is
> > - use WAKom instead of anything that does a special encoding
> > - use #isoToUtf8 on all strings you define in your image
> > - strings that come from the outside (requests) are already utf-8
> So instead of using WAKomEncoded39.... we can use WAKom and converts
> image strings in UTF8.
> Is it correct ?
No, WAKom does not converting whatsoever.
> What about the performance ? better with WAKom/#isoToUtf8 or with
> WAKomEncoded39 (or equal :) ) ?
Premature optimization. Performance should play no role in your
decision WAKom <-> WAKomEncoded
You don't have this choice in Squeak 3.9. In Squeak 3.9 WAKomEncoded39
is the only thing that works.
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the Seaside