[Seaside] i10n or speed?

[Philippe Marschall]

2007/3/19, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
>
> On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:58 , Philippe Marschall wrote:
>
> > encodeForHTTP.
> >
> > So what do you find more important, that Seaside is fast or that is
> > supports non-ascii urls?
>
> I'm pretty sure you could have your cake and eat it, too, if you
> rewrite that method

We don't do overrides anymore.

> using #indexOfAnyOf: and CharacterSets, which are
> very fast.

You would do this as a replacement for #isSafeForHTTP? Why not just a
boolean Array and lookup by #charCode?

Do you see any optimization potential in
#encodeForHTTPWithTextEncoding:conditionBlock: ?

Philippe

> - Bert -
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>