[Seaside] i10n or speed?
bert at freudenbergs.de
Mon Mar 19 12:19:08 UTC 2007
On Mar 19, 2007, at 12:58 , Philippe Marschall wrote:
> 2007/3/19, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
>> On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:58 , Philippe Marschall wrote:
>> > encodeForHTTP.
>> > So what do you find more important, that Seaside is fast or that is
>> > supports non-ascii urls?
>> I'm pretty sure you could have your cake and eat it, too, if you
>> rewrite that method
> We don't do overrides anymore.
>> using #indexOfAnyOf: and CharacterSets, which are
>> very fast.
> You would do this as a replacement for #isSafeForHTTP? Why not just a
> boolean Array and lookup by #charCode?
Because it's much faster?
> Do you see any optimization potential in
> #encodeForHTTPWithTextEncoding:conditionBlock: ?
If I'd see the code, probably.
- Bert -
More information about the seaside