[Seaside] Re: Which persistence solution to use?
Smalltalk at jgfoster.net
Sun May 13 19:16:24 UTC 2007
On Sunday 13 May 2007 8:52 am, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> 2007/5/13, James Foster <Smalltalk at jgfoster.net>:
> > On Sunday 13 May 2007 2:43 am, Udo Schneider wrote:
> > > James Foster wrote:
> > > > Why "outside the image"? Do you need to get access to the data from
> > > > something other than Seaside?
> > >
> > > Not really. The reason is to be able to share the data between multiple
> > > running Squeak/Seaside instances.
> > Why do you need multiple instances? Is one instance unable to handle the
> > requests?
> Scaling, computer with more than one CPU/core, failover, ....
Are you answering on behalf of Udo, or are you just providing a general list
of reasons why someone might want to run multiple instances? Are you making a
distinction between "scaling" and "computer with more than one CPU/core" or
are the two reasons equivalent? How many pages per second are your serving
such that one instance is inadequate?
More information about the seaside