[Seaside] Re: GOODS

Avi Bryant avi at dabbledb.com
Mon Nov 19 22:46:18 UTC 2007

On 11/19/07, C. David Shaffer <cdshaffer at acm.org> wrote:

> I don't want to interrupt Sebastian as I'm sure he has some very good
> reasons for not liking GOODS. But I do want to add that there are
> several of us using it in production and it is a great persistence
> solution in Squeak. The only problem I really have with it (which is not
> a GOODS problem but a Squeak problem) is that commits can be very slow
> if you have loaded a lot of objects in a transaction.

So you're finding that writes are the main bottleneck, and that read
performance is fine?  I'd be curious to hear more about this; in my
own limited experiments the read performance was what concerned me


More information about the seaside mailing list