conradwt at gmail.com
Tue Oct 30 19:02:36 UTC 2007
Hi, I have been using Prototype and Scriptaculous for a bit over a year and
pleased with the performance that it gives my applications. Also, they are
considered to be lower level frameworks for building AJAX applicationn
whereis YUI and EXT tend to more widget based. Furthermore, EXT can be used
on top of YUI, JQuery or Prototype. Thus, it might be a good idea to have
adapters for these various frameworks so that one can easily switch and/or
On 10/30/07, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com > wrote:
> > Lukas> 1. Please check out the Scriptaculous history in Monticello
> > Lukas> making false assertions in public.
> > I realize that prototype 1.5 fixes some of the problems. It doesn't fix
> > of them. I don't think that's a false assertion.
> This is not what I ment, but anyway.
> > Lukas> 2. At the time when script.aculo.us was picket (June 2005), there
> > I don't mean to sound like you made the wrong decision at the time. I
> > mean that in light of today's YUI availability, you bet on the wrong
> pony. I
> > hope to correct that by helping to create a complete YUI interface
> You are comparing apples and oranges. YUI is mostly a widget library,
> while Prototype is a framework to assist AJAX application development.
> As of today I would indeed choose a different library. However I am
> certain that Prototype is a far better choice than YUI for what it
> tools to have more control over the client side. YUI is bloated and
> overly complex. It hardly matches the model of stateful components in
> Lukas Renggli
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the seaside