[Seaside] Re: SVG Rendering Engine

[Victor]

Oh, I see,  The problem is in the BOM text. It's too generic.  However, the 
motivation is graphics manipulation, or so I interpreted it to be.

Here is the way I put both together:
    SVG is about scalability.  Standardization is one dimension of 
scalability.  HLA and BOM deal with standardization.  Voila! Standardized 
scalability!!!  :-)

Victor

===============================================

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Holger Kleinsorgen" <h.kleinsorgen at i-views.de>
To: "Seaside - general discussion" <seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Seaside] Re: SVG Rendering Engine


> Victor schrieb:
>> Where do you see the disconnect?
>
> Where to begin? let's quote:
>
> BOM:
> ----
> (from http://www.boms.info/)
>
> "The Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO) focuses on 
> facilitating simulation interoperability across government and 
> non-government applications worldwide."
>
> SVG:
> ----
> (from http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/)
>
> "SVG is a language for describing two-dimensional graphics and graphical 
> applications in XML"
>
> ----
> The only common divisor I see is XML, but well, that doesnt count. I 
> *really* don't see any direct connection between a simulation 
> interoperatibility standard and a vector graphics description language.
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>