Re: [Seaside] Re: Yes, it works - and fast too! (was [Q] File Upload/Download Server, Comanche or Swazoo)

["S.J.Chun"]

Wow, now squeak can be best solution not just in productivity side but also for
performance side. 

----- Original Message -----
   From: Göran Krampe <goran at krampe.se>
   To: Seaside - general discussion <seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
   Sent: 08-08-04 23:35:22
   Subject: Re: [Seaside] Re: Yes,	it works - and fast too! (was [Q] File Upload/Download	Server,  Comanche or Swazoo)

  Hi all!

The race continues - I was disappointed with the numbers below:

Janko Mivšek wrote:

>   Squeak:
> 
>     Kom/Seaside  1M 110 104 104 (avg 5.7MB/s)
>         10M 100 104  98 (avg 5.9MB/s) (+4%)
> 
>     Swazoo/Aida  8K 102 107 105 (avg 5.7MB/s)
>                  1M  93  92  93 (avg 6.5MB/s) (+20%)
>                 10M  90  89  91 (avg 6.7MB/s

...and especially for the 102 Mb file (not included above), so I took a
look and yes, of course I found silly stuff going on in SocketStream. My
fixes aren't proper yet but it seems Kom can do just as good - I did
reach the 9Mb for a 81Mb file, now I am tuning it. Will post when I get
it proper.

regards, Göran
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside