[Seaside] WARegistry performance

Julian Fitzell jfitzell at gmail.com
Sun Dec 14 00:15:24 UTC 2008

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Balázs Kósi <rebmekop at gmail.com> wrote:
> What do you think?

Well, I like the look of the benchmarks anyway. :)

In Seaside 2.9, WARegistry now keeps things in a WACache instance.
WACache is designed to be pluggable in terms of expiry, reaping, etc.
but hasn't been optimized at all (I'm not even certain the concurrency
is right yet :) ). If you're at all interested in seeing how your
changes could be implemented in 2.9 as well, I'm sure that would be


More information about the seaside mailing list