[Seaside] Swazoo as reverse proxy?

Boris Popov boris at deepcovelabs.com
Fri Feb 8 16:11:02 UTC 2008

As a data point, we are currently moving from proxying apps with apache to F5 balancers, I would never want to have a net facing server actually be in the image that runs my app, I just don't want to reinvent the wheel in terms of load handling, balancing and security.


-Boris (via BlackBerry)

----- Original Message -----
From: seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org <seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
To: Seaside - general discussion <seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Fri Feb 08 06:23:52 2008
Subject: Re: [Seaside] Swazoo as reverse proxy?

> So, what do you think? Is it a good idea, do you see any obstacles?

In my opinion Smalltalk is not competitive when it comes to
reading/writing bytes from/to pipes, sockets and files. There are
other systems that can handle that much more efficiently.


Lukas Renggli
seaside mailing list
seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20080208/0d1bf87f/attachment.htm

More information about the seaside mailing list