[Seaside] Swazoo as reverse proxy?

[Janko Mivšek]

Boris Popov wrote:

> As a data point, we are currently moving from proxying apps with apache 
> to F5 balancers, I would never want to have a net facing server actually 
> be in the image that runs my app, I just don't want to reinvent the 
> wheel in terms of load handling, balancing and security.

That's actually one of main goals: running a Swazoo reverse proxy in a 
separate image to isolate web facing server from actual web apps.

Best regards
Janko


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> <seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> To: Seaside - general discussion <seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> Sent: Fri Feb 08 06:23:52 2008
> Subject: Re: [Seaside] Swazoo as reverse proxy?
> 
>  > So, what do you think? Is it a good idea, do you see any obstacles?
> 
> In my opinion Smalltalk is not competitive when it comes to
> reading/writing bytes from/to pipes, sockets and files. There are
> other systems that can handle that much more efficiently.
> 
> Cheers,
> Lukas
> 
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

-- 
Janko Mivšek
AIDA/Web
Smalltalk Web Application Server
http://www.aidaweb.si