[Seaside] Re: Re: Swazoo as reverse proxy?
itsme213 at hotmail.com
Sat Feb 9 22:28:12 UTC 2008
"Boris Popov" <boris at deepcovelabs.com> wrote
> Well, for internal deployments of this small scale that don't need ssl and
> other advanced features Swazoo, Kom and others are already good enough,
> isn't it?
Dunno. e.g. Does Swazoo server static content? I don't think Kom does. Not
sure what other "features" make or don't make sense, and I do understand the
points about not re-inventing Apache.
Unsure ... Sophie
More information about the seaside