[Seaside] Four proposals to improve Seaside

Victor vmgoldberg at verizon.net
Mon Apr 20 19:06:08 UTC 2009


A few years ago there was a troll like this at comp.lang.smalltalk.  The pattern of behavior is either very similar or the same.  Maybe it's the same person, and the reason for the anonymity is so as not to be identified as such?

Víctor


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: TheSmalltalkBlog at gmx.ch 
  To: Seaside - general discussion 
  Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:04 PM
  Subject: Re: RE: [Seaside] Four proposals to improve Seaside


  Well, I begin to understand that Seaside was made only for such ingenious people - and that I am still ages away to be one of them and that I will probably never make it there.

  9.  Your criticizing Seaside because you modified Swazoo and duplicated code you also modified in Seaside. Absurd.

  But even so great wise people like you sometimes don't read carefully and therefore don't understand what they read. You better read the comments on this post for more explanation! (You are 100% completely off the subject with your reply)



    -------- Original-Nachricht --------
    Datum: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:34:46 -0700
    Von: "Ramon Leon" <ramon.leon at allresnet.com>
    An: "'Seaside - general discussion'" <seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
    Betreff: RE: [Seaside] Four proposals to improve Seaside



    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:seaside-
    > bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of
    > TheSmalltalkBlog at gmx.ch
    > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 10:04 AM
    > To: seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
    > Subject: [Seaside] Four proposals to improve Seaside
    > 
    > There are 4 new concrete technical proposals how to improve Seaside and
    > one more comment on my blog:
    > 
    > http://thesmalltalkblog.blogspot.com
    > 
    > Comments and critics welcome!

    What do you know, not one of them makes sense.

    9. Seaside works with various web servers, WARequest is the adaptor they can
    all use to work with Seaside. Your criticizing Seaside because you modified
    Swazoo and duplicated code you also modified in Seaside. Absurd.

    8, 7. Use Apache to serve up static content like every other sane person
    and recognize that Seaside does it for development convenience, not for
    handling production load that requires it to be insanely fast. The rest of
    the world works with files and pathnames, and for serving web content and
    staying compatible, so should Seaside.

    6. You're over playing the accepted use of this "new" convention, yea, some
    people do it and just as many don't. It's an issue of personal style, not
    some big well known convention Seaside is ignoring. We have method
    protocols for a reason, we don't have to duplicate them in the method names.
    You want to know if something is a constructor, look at the protocol, not a
    naming pattern.

    Ramon Leon
    http://onsmalltalk.com

    _______________________________________________
    seaside mailing list
    seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
    http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside




  -- 
  Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  seaside mailing list
  seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
  http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20090420/035d40b3/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the seaside mailing list