[Seaside] Any problem using udpated/changed pattern with component

Philippe Marschall philippe.marschall at gmail.com
Mon Apr 27 10:45:38 UTC 2009


Components are Smalltalk objects so Smalltalk object semantics for
memory management apply.

Cheers
Philippe

2009/4/27 Hilaire Fernandes <hilaire at ofset.org>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I want one component to be informed from another one when the latter
> attributes changed.
>
> Are there any problem using udpated/changed pattern with components?
>
> I am wondering about side effect as components still referenced in
> memory even if not used anymore.
>
>
> Hilaire
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFJ9XW1SAvrR6lz6PQRAphWAJ9UgpzpyqGjb/JtJV6jLEzUPdZpowCgtrUc
> zlNmgSBvNJ/fUHdHZcuUZ1g=
> =3rB4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>


More information about the seaside mailing list