mm3 at zepler.net
Thu Feb 19 15:15:53 UTC 2009
But...will continuation-based coding be available as well?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com> wrote:
> Not much, you just use CPS (continuation passing style) to define flow.
> So instead of
> result := self call: aComponent.
> result doSomethingWithIt.
> you write
> self show: aComponent onAnswer: [ :result |
> result doSomethingWithIt ]
> CPS gets nasty with complicated flows (loops) and when other (library,
> model) code is involved, but a transformation is always possible. So
> it is strictly equivalent.
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Gerardo Richarte <gera at corest.com> wrote:
>> Lukas Renggli wrote:
>>> Continuations are no longer a requirement as of Seaside 2.9.
>> that's interesting.
>> Is there any difference in functionality with and without continuations?
>> seaside mailing list
>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Lukas Renggli
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the seaside