RossBoylan at stanfordalumni.org
Sun May 3 18:31:19 UTC 2009
Excellent! Now I get it.
It looks as if some stuff built on Seaside, e.g., Pier, adds a
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 10:59 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> >>>>> "Ross" == Ross Boylan <RossBoylan at stanfordalumni.org> writes:
> Ross> First, the attacker could pretend to be someone else. I need Seaside to
> Ross> identify accurately who the requestor is or to reject forged requests
> Ross> before they get to my code. Previous discussion on the list indicates
> Ross> that, with suitable precautions, an outsider can not hijack an existing
> Ross> session. Can someone with a legitimate session assume another identity?
> Ross> Can someone without a session assume an identity?
> Seaside doesn't know "identity". That's all in your app code. All seaside is
> going to do with the incoming values is reawaken your session-saved state,
> including the state of all components. If one of those values is your
> app-defined "identity", that's up to you to manage properly.
> Ross> Second, the request could attempt to execute some code that is outside
> Ross> the normal flow of operations. I don't know if the latter is possible
> Ross> with Seaside; in other frameworks such as Zope it is possible (and it
> Ross> has security systems to keep this in check). Or they could start
> Ross> traversing the object graph, even with the debugging interface off.
> Ross> Again, I'm not clear: are either of these scenarios (access to code or
> Ross> objects) possible. Are they?
> Not possible, unless you happen to be silly enough to "eval" incoming
> arbitrary strings as Smalltalk code.
> Of course, if the Smalltalk VM has a buffer overflow problem, all bets are
> off. :) But no known bugs at this time on those.
More information about the seaside