[Seaside] Swazoo v. Kom

Philippe Marschall philippe.marschall at gmail.com
Tue May 19 04:53:55 UTC 2009

2009/5/18 Lautaro Fernández <evaklo at gmail.com>:
> 2009/5/18 Philippe Marschall <philippe.marschall at gmail.com>
>> 2009/5/18 John Chludzinski <john.chludzinski at gmail.com>:
>> > I'm using Seaside to develop a suite of web apps for mobile devices;
>> > I'm
>> > also a newbie to Seaside.  Is there a reason to prefer Swazoo v. Kom.
>> Swazoo is seeing more active development currently and runs on several
>> dialects,  Kom runs only on Squeak. Swazoo does not support Comet
> Sorry, but Swazoo supports HTTP Streaming, which allows you to implement
> Comet. We know this because we had to switch from Opentalk (which does not
> support streaming very well) to Swazoo 2.1 (later to 2.2 beta 1) to make our
> Comet implementation for Seaside+Swazoo work.

I mean the Seaside implementation (CT*) not comet in general.


More information about the seaside mailing list