[Seaside] Call and Answer

[Robert Sirois]

If you had a lot of "component Bs" would it be faster to just pass it component A? Or will this second method always be faster?

RS

Peter Osburg <peter.osburg at gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Richard,
>
>I guess from now on I would prefer that one, as well :)
>
>Thanks,
>Peter
>
>2009/10/16 Richard Durr <richard.durr at googlemail.com>
>
>> I would prefer something like
>> ComponentA>>renderContentOn: html
>>   | component |
>>   component := ComponentB new onAnswer: [ :answerB |
>>     self answer: answerB
>>   ].
>>   html render: component.
>>
>> since it does not need a reference to the root component (~decoupling).
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Robert Sirois <watchlala at hotmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>  That worked perfectly, thank you :)
>>>
>>> RS
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:04:30 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: [Seaside] Call and Answer
>>> From: peter.osburg at gmail.com
>>> To: seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>
>>> I know this problem very well.
>>> One way could be, to pass a reference of WAComponentA to WAComponentB.
>>>
>>> You could probably create an instance variable called
>>> rootComponent
>>>
>>> After you initialized WAComponentB, you give it the reference from within
>>> WAComponentA, e.g.:
>>> WAComponentA
>>>   *renderContentOn:html *
>>>        |component|
>>>        component := (WAComponentB new) rootComponent: self.
>>>        html render: component.
>>>
>>> And within WAComponentB:
>>>   *answer *>> self rootComponent answer: 'blah'
>>>
>>> I hope this helps.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> 2009/10/15 Robert Sirois <watchlala at hotmail.com>
>>>
>>>  I'm trying something a little strange here, and my logic is really quite
>>> flawed:
>>>
>>> someWATask
>>>     go >> self call: WAComponentA
>>>
>>> WAComponentA
>>>     renderContentOn: >> html render: WAComponentB
>>>     children >> ^Array with: WAComponentB
>>>
>>> WAComponentB
>>>     answer >> self answer: 'blah'
>>>
>>> I would like for WAComponentB to answer someWATask in place of
>>> WAComponentA, is there a way to do this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> RS
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seaside mailing list
>>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.peter-osburg.de
>>> www.experiencedwebprogramming.com
>>> www.mix-rss.com
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up
>>> now. <http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seaside mailing list
>>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seaside mailing list
>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>www.peter-osburg.de
>www.experiencedwebprogramming.com
>www.mix-rss.com
>_______________________________________________
>seaside mailing list
>seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside