[Seaside] Can you save CTPusher instances?
watchlala at hotmail.com
Sat May 15 17:51:11 UTC 2010
Oh heck no. What I was hoping to do was have a bunch of different components that just a few users could be a part of as far as pusher handlers go.
> Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:48:03 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Seaside] Can you save CTPusher instances?
> From: richard.durr at googlemail.com
> To: seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> I do not understand: Isn't this the default-way?
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Robert Sirois <watchlala at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I was wondering if you could hold an instance of CTPusher on the instance
> > side of a WAComponent and then only the clients that render that WAComponent
> > will be pushed the js from that pusher? Or am I just trying to make
> > something work that can't...
> > RS
> > ________________________________
> > The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with
> > Hotmail. Get busy.
> > _______________________________________________
> > seaside mailing list
> > seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the seaside