[Seaside] Can you save CTPusher instances?

[Robert Sirois]

Oh heck no. What I was hoping to do was have a bunch of different components that just a few users could be a part of as far as pusher handlers go. 

RS

> Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:48:03 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Seaside] Can you save CTPusher instances?
> From: richard.durr at googlemail.com
> To: seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> 
> I do not understand: Isn't this the default-way?
> 
> RD
> 
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Robert Sirois <watchlala at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I was wondering if you could hold an instance of CTPusher on the instance
> > side of a WAComponent and then only the clients that render that WAComponent
> > will be pushed the js from that pusher? Or am I just trying to make
> > something work that can't...
> >
> > RS
> >
> > ________________________________
> > The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with
> > Hotmail. Get busy.
> > _______________________________________________
> > seaside mailing list
> > seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20100515/ab662051/attachment.htm