[Seaside] About Deployment

[Mariano Martinez Peck]

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Lawson English <lenglish5 at cox.net> wrote:

>  On 12/1/09 9:18 AM, Frederic Pluquet wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I use Seaside for a lot of personal development and I love its rapidity of
>> development! But for real deployment there is a big disadvantage. At my
>> knowledge, I have only two solutions to deploy an application: have an own
>> server (what I do for the moment) or put my image on seasidehosting.
>>
>
> You appear to have solved your problem, but in the future, you might
> consider our hosting service: http://www.morphle.org/ which will offer
> unique seaside/squeak solutions via dedicated Siliconsqueak hardware...
>
>
wow...that's awesome. But there is something I don't understand.
Siliconsqueak says:

"SiliconSqueak is a processor chip that will run almost all existing
Squeak<http://www.squeak.org/>images without modification. It is a
hardware "virtual machine"."

now...wouldn't that crash or break code?  If a squeak image is done using
green threads and with this, I could have multiple native threads/CPUs...so?

thanks

Mariano


>
> Lawson English
>
> helpdesk at squeakhosting.org (not affiliated with squeakhosting.st)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20101003/74944e6a/attachment.htm