[Seaside] About Deployment
Mariano Martinez Peck
marianopeck at gmail.com
Sun Oct 3 20:15:20 UTC 2010
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Lawson English <lenglish5 at cox.net> wrote:
> On 12/1/09 9:18 AM, Frederic Pluquet wrote:
>> I use Seaside for a lot of personal development and I love its rapidity of
>> development! But for real deployment there is a big disadvantage. At my
>> knowledge, I have only two solutions to deploy an application: have an own
>> server (what I do for the moment) or put my image on seasidehosting.
> You appear to have solved your problem, but in the future, you might
> consider our hosting service: http://www.morphle.org/ which will offer
> unique seaside/squeak solutions via dedicated Siliconsqueak hardware...
wow...that's awesome. But there is something I don't understand.
"SiliconSqueak is a processor chip that will run almost all existing
Squeak<http://www.squeak.org/>images without modification. It is a
hardware "virtual machine"."
now...wouldn't that crash or break code? If a squeak image is done using
green threads and with this, I could have multiple native threads/CPUs...so?
> Lawson English
> helpdesk at squeakhosting.org (not affiliated with squeakhosting.st)
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the seaside