[Seaside] Pharo 1.1.1 and Cog?
bart.veenstra at gmail.com
Tue Oct 12 07:44:45 UTC 2010
The user experience in pharo is also much much better. It feels a lot
snappier. Without the cogvm, i feel like my computer is to slow,
although it runs Bioshock 2 at 1920x1200 at full detail.
2010/10/12 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at beta9.be>:
> End of august I wrote:
> I did a quick benchmark on that last image: where I used to get 70 requests/second I now get 230 requests/second.
> Nothing scientific, but Komanche+Seaside3 on Cog was almost 3 times faster...
> On 12 Oct 2010, at 09:38, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>> Komanche is kind of slow as a web server on Cog (slower than on a
>> normal VM). I suspect that this is because of DynamicBindings that do
>> a lot of ugly stack trickery. We need to replace or fix Komanche in
>> that regard. I don't know the state of the Zn-Server? Philippe?
>> Seaside itself is fast, noticeably faster.
>> On 12 October 2010 09:32, Davorin Rusevljan <davorin.rusevljan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Sure, the one-click images run on Cog.
>>> whoha, that is great! How does it stack up regarding seaside performance
>>> when compared to classic VM? Any stability issues?
>>> seaside mailing list
>>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> Lukas Renggli
>> seaside mailing list
>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the seaside