[Seaside] Pharo 1.1.1 and Cog?

[Bart Veenstra]

The user experience in pharo is also much much better. It feels a lot
snappier. Without the cogvm, i feel like my computer is to slow,
although it runs Bioshock 2 at 1920x1200 at full detail.

2010/10/12 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at beta9.be>:
> End of august I wrote:
>
> I did a quick benchmark on that last image: where I used to get 70 requests/second I now get 230 requests/second.
>
> Nothing scientific, but Komanche+Seaside3 on Cog was almost 3 times faster...
>
> Sven
>
> On 12 Oct 2010, at 09:38, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>
>> Komanche is kind of slow as a web server on Cog (slower than on a
>> normal VM). I suspect that this is because of DynamicBindings that do
>> a lot of ugly stack trickery. We need to replace or fix Komanche in
>> that regard. I don't know the state of the Zn-Server? Philippe?
>>
>> Seaside itself is fast, noticeably faster.
>>
>> Lukas
>>
>> On 12 October 2010 09:32, Davorin Rusevljan <davorin.rusevljan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sure, the one-click images run on Cog.
>>>>
>>>
>>> whoha, that is great!  How does it stack up regarding seaside performance
>>> when compared to classic VM? Any stability issues?
>>>
>>> rush
>>> http://www.cloud208.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seaside mailing list
>>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>> _______________________________________________
>> seaside mailing list
>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>