[Seaside] Re: [squeak-dev] Re: [Pharo-project] SqueakSource AND
SmalltalkHub down ; )
sebastian at flowingconcept.com
Wed Apr 20 12:55:16 UTC 2011
"... if ... could store
meaningfully into the git repo, that could help wih visibility of
Smalltalk a lot."
Not only visibility because is were the people is but because you can comment code at method level in a social environment.
That makes all the difference. Lists, emails or commenting issues aren't helping on that.
Only the guys that one method to method side by side talking about things are having that experience.
That makes us slower (or more vulnerable to work faster in the wrong things.)
On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Davorin Rusevljan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Germán Arduino <garduino at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2011/4/20 Sebastian Sastre <sebastian at flowingconcept.com>:
>>> Ok question:
>>> why don't why have (yet) something to save in something more known, say github?
>> 2. I largely prefer open source solutions that I can implement on my
>> own resources (hardware/datacenter). As far I saw Github is a sort of
>> cloud service and free only to some projects....Well I don't trust in
>> such sort of solutions.
>> I prefer a complete solution I can manage from start to end and were I
>> don't depend of other companies.
> Correct me if I am wrong but technically, storing on git hub is just
> like storing in any other git repository, being it github, your
> notebook, or repo inside Mars rover.
> I did not thougt this in depth, but if Monticello could store
> meaningfully into the git repo, that could help wih visibility of
> Smalltalk a lot.
> Davorin Rusevljan
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the seaside