[Seaside] Re: SqueakSource
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Fri Dec 2 16:28:01 UTC 2011
How about doing something to improve the situation a little while
squeaksource.com is still heavily in use? When we switched to the trunk
development model we gave source.squeak.org a long hard look and
improved its stability significantly. I'm sure some of these changes are
applicable to squeaksource.com as well.
If the image is available I'd be happy to take a look. And if debug logs
from system failures are available that would be even better.
On 12/2/2011 14:23, Sebastian Sastre wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>> I too depend on it, as many others.
>> But as Doru said there is not really someone to blame.
> hey, this wasn't to blame somebody, specially having in mind they
> But I don't find okay to pretend it was good design.
> No matter how good a VM is, things crash. Is not about /if/, is about
> So not being fault tolerant in something you need resilient is a faulty
> design (no matter how old the software is).
> If we face that, we will not find acceptable crappy design and things
> can only get better.
> Again, I'm happy smalltalkhub is coming
> sebastian <http://about.me/sebastianconcept>
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the seaside