[Seaside] Class Variable Browser Fix
ted.wrinch at gmail.com
Thu Jul 14 12:28:42 UTC 2011
Damn - I suspected something like that and did a few tests; but not well enough it seems. It's a shame, as '&' is much simpler to write (some things I was never too keen on in the original Smalltalk). '&&' might be a candidate for an 'and:' alternative; but I could understand people not liking this ugly C syntax either.
On 14 Jul 2011, at 09:10, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> On 14 Jul 2011, at 09:56, Ted Wrinch wrote:
>> by using '&' instead of the older 'and:'
> Ted, beware, these are not equivalent !
> & always evaluates its argument
> and: only evaluates its argument when necessary ('short circuit boolean evalution').
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the seaside