[Seaside] Comparison of Aida/Web, Seaside and Iliad web frameworks

Boris Popov, DeepCove Labs boris at deepcovelabs.com
Tue Jun 21 20:53:35 UTC 2011

I have to agree with Ramon here and get a sense it would have been a better start to have empty values for Seaside/Iliad and remove items that aren't generally considered part of the core framework and usually are packaged as add-ons.


-----Original Message-----
From: seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Ramon Leon
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 4:46 PM
To: seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Seaside] Comparison of Aida/Web, Seaside and Iliad web frameworks

On 06/21/2011 01:17 PM, Janko Mivšek wrote:
> So, now I'm inviting all of you to take a look at this Google Docs 
> spreadsheet and comment it. This way we will come at least one step 
> closer to so needed comparison:

Seaside can do clean URL's
Seaside most certainly does do automatic URL generation Seaside absolutely allows multiple websites served from one image Seaside supports Comet Seaside absolutely can do single page apps

I give up, too many things wrong or simply labeled in such as way as to exclude anything other than AIDA from saying yes.

Tabulation with Enter... are you kidding me, that has absolutely nothing to do with a web framework.  That's one of a dozen similar examples of such things.

Ramon Leon
seaside mailing list
seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org

More information about the seaside mailing list