[Seaside] Seaside redirects, really?

Norbert Hartl norbert at hartl.name
Mon Oct 3 19:46:44 UTC 2011


Am 03.10.2011 um 14:42 schrieb Sebastian Sastre:

> ok, for you a ~20-40% improvement in response times isn't an incentive appealing to do anything about it. 

how did you measure those numbers? Did you have keep-alive active? 

With keep-alive there is only little more that is happening when doing this redirect scenario. One of the biggest latency factors is initiating a TCP connection. Most pages load quite a few images and such in parallel (today it is 4 concurrent connections or more). From that point the textual transfer of the form and the response shouldn't matter that much. With keep-alive especially that redirect scenario should be well supported. For everything else you need HTTP pipelining which is unfortunately still not used in todays browsers. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20111003/11e90e41/attachment.htm

More information about the seaside mailing list